• Be Nice - You Never Know Who That Email is From
• A Great Round-up of Blog Ad Networks
• PageRank Mania - Is it getting out of hand?
• Is Google PageRank for Real?

Great to see this topic coming up. Goodwill really is a nice way to look at things. You write about/link to what you feel has value, and everyone wins.

Posted by: Michael Dorausch on October 5, 2007

It's particularly odd to worry about the PR0 right now. Google hasn't updated since April! I keep wondering what the heck my PR will be if Google ever gets around to updating.

It's probably wise to avoid negotiated reciprocal link exchanges with loads of PR0 blogs. But that's mostly because you need to be careful about negotiated reciprocal link exchanges!

Posted by: lucia on October 5, 2007

Thanks Jennifer! I'll also add that I didn't get a page rank until I was 6 months old - then I went from PR0 to PR4. And with the stink Google has raised lately about paid links, I wonder if the last PR update was indeed the "LAST"!

Posted by: Wendy Piersall on October 5, 2007

While I see the point she's trying to make... pr0 sites are pr0 for a reason... Either they are new or they are of poor quality.

I'll link to a site if I think it's great - but when it's new you can never be sure of what will happen with it in the future... it could have one great article and then go to crap/stop updating/404 - of course you can always go back and de-link but who has time to do that?

Posted by: Wingnut on October 5, 2007

I've had 3 retail websites since 2005. I've traded links all along and worked really hard to get increased page rank and was up to a 4 on all of them even though my traffic was really low (less than 50 hits a day). When Google changed it's math, my sites went down to a PR2 on all 3 sites and I literally cried. I started reading all this press about not trading links with 0 or 1 PR and was so confused because I so much appreciated those folks that traded with me when I had PR at less than zero. I had always tried to be selective to only those sites within my theme, but I then started being far more restrictive in my agreements. I gotta tell ya, it's hard to know who to believe these days. I have a full-time job besides my 3 wesbsites so any minor success I get is celebrated. I've started a keyword analysis all over again on my one site, and have purchased and read copywriters guides and other recommended reading by Jill Whalen (so glad I found her info by the way). I've now increased my traffic by 30-40 hits per day (don't laugh, you don't know how much of an accomplishment that is to someone as small as me..), and it's slowly climbing. You all just keep weighing in and putting out all of this good information. There are little guys out here that think that your words are golden.

Posted by: Julie E. on October 6, 2007

Wingnut, I fail to understand why you think you'd have to go back and delink to a site that didn't eventually rise above a PR0?

A good piece of content is a good piece of content no matter where it resides. If you are honestly deciding who you link to based on the amount of green in that little bar...you need to start rethinking your linking strategy.

You're a human being. You are more than capable of deciding the value and quality of a piece of content without relying on Google's often inaccurate assessment.

Posted by: Jennifer Laycock on October 7, 2007

good article. I am always confused on how the ranking and popularity numbers always messed up and down like crazy when it has increasing web traffic..

Posted by: Robert on October 7, 2007

Considering that Google is closing in on 6 months since their last update of page rank in the Google Tool Bar (which is the page rank we mere mortals can actually see), any page rank you're seeing when you check a site's PR is closing in on being 6 months *out of date*.

I have sites that still show a PR of 4, but the amount of daily traffic being sent to them by Google has doubled or even tripled.

Google claims they update quarterly (on average). Their previous longest time between updates was 4 months. So should we read anything into the fact that, as of today, they've exceeded their prior longest gap by 6 weeks and they're being oddly quiet about it.

Posted by: Greg Bulmash on October 11, 2007