Jill Whalen

Jill Whalen

Articles

Hey Jill,

I am in the process of changing all my URLs from things like news123.html to OurCompany_Announces_New_CEO.html

Are there any problems associated with these wholesale changes, apart from making sure to have a redirect for external links?

Please let me know.

Thanks,

Lorenz

Jill's Response

Hi Lorenz,

I would highly recommend *not* changing your URLs at all. It is a common misconception that keywords in URLs are somehow helpful to search engine rankings, when in reality, they have very little (if any) effect on rankings.

The reasons why people believe they help rankings are many, but generally center on a mixing up of cause and effect, as many people learning about SEO are apt to do.

For instance, when you do a keyword phrase search at Google, you will see your keywords bolded on the search engine results page, including keywords that appear in the URLs. People see this and assume that it means Google factors the bolded words into their relevancy algorithms. Yet, the software that does the bolding is just that — software that is programmed to bold the queried words that show up in the listings. It's a huge leap to think that the bold type has anything to do with Google's actual algorithm.

Another reason why people wrongly assume that keyword phrases in URLs are a factor in getting a page to show up in the search results is because the top results do indeed often use keyworded URLs! But (and this is a big but) websites that use keyword-rich URLs are using them because someone, somewhere is attempting to optimize the pages to show up in the search results — which means they are doing a lot more than simply putting keywords in URLs as part of their website optimization. Very rarely will you see a page show up in the search results if the only place the keyword phrase appears is the URL. Most likely the phrase is also being used in the Title tag and other visible places on the page. So again, there's a mixing up of cause and effect.

What has happened over the years is that the mixer-uppers have spread the word that keywords in URLs will help with rankings, so others believe it and make changes to their own URLs, making more and more keyword-rich URLs appear in the search engine results pages (SERPs). Which, of course, feeds the myth-monster even more!

All that said, this is somewhat of a tricky one to prove one way or another, and it certainly doesn't hurt to use keyword-rich URLs when building a new website. It often makes it easier to remember the URL, which is why on our new High Rankings site most of our URLs will have keywords. It's not for SEO purposes, but for usability purposes. If we didn't have to change our URLs due to switching backend platforms, we definitely wouldn't go changing to keyword-rich file names. But since we had to change them anyhow, I figured we could use our site as a test bed to see what happens when you change URLs. (And yes, I realize we could have done some complicated things behind the scenes to continue to keep our URLs the same as they were, but in this case, we felt changing them and redirecting was our best solution. Especially as I can probably get a few good articles out of it later!)

I can't stress enough that you should never change URLs simply for SEO purposes. But if you do have to change them, and you do want to eke out any possible search engine benefit that you might get, then you should not use underscores between the words, but hyphens instead. Even though Google recently announced that they were going to start reading underscores as a word separator, traditionally they haven't. They do read hyphens as a separator, however. So if Google decides to use URLs to rank pages, then you'd want to at least create them in a way they can read. You would also not want to put two words together like "twowords.html" as they don't separate words that are mashed together that way either.

Where you may benefit from a keyword-rich URL that has its words separated by a hyphen is when another site links to your page by using just the URL because it becomes somewhat of a keyword-rich anchor text link. For example, if someone links to your page with this URL www.example.com/keyword1-keyword2 (instead of using traditional anchor text) you'd still have keyword1-keyword2 as part of the anchor text, which does tell the search engines that the page they're about to go to is at least somewhat relevant to those keyword phrases.

So in answer to the original question, instead of changing the existing URLs, make sure you've optimized the page elements that do matter – especially the Title tag, the anchor text pointing to that page, and the words on the actual page itself — and don't worry about the URLs. Changing them can lose any "age equity" that you may have built up with your old URLs, with minimal (if any) effect on rankings.

If after all this you still feel the need to change them, be sure to put 301-redirects in place from the old URLs to the new, and use hyphens rather than underscores.

Hope this helps!

Jill


December 10, 2007





CEO and founder of High Rankings®, Jill Whalen has been performing search engine optimization since 1995 and is the host of the free High Rankings Advisor search engine marketing newsletter, author of "The Nitty-gritty of Writing for the Search Engines" and founder/administrator of the popular High Rankings Search Engine Optimization Forum. In 2006, Jill co-founded SEMNE, a local search engine marketing networking organization for people and companies in New England.

High Rankings is an internationally recognized search engine optimization firm located in Framingham, MA specializing in search engine optimization, SEO consultations, in-house training, site audit reports, search marketing seminars and workshops. High Rankings has a 100% success rate for substantially improving client rankings and targeted traffic.

Jill speaks at national and international conferences and has been writing about SEO and search marketing since 2000. She's been quoted in such publications as The Wall Street Journal, U.S. News & World Report and The Washington Post. Her articles have appeared in numerous print magazines and online websites including CIO Magazine, CMS Focus, The Internet Marketing Report, ClickZ, WorkZ, Inc.com, Entrepreneur, Lycos Small Business, WebProNews, SiteProNews and others. Jill has also appeared on many online and offline radio programs such as Entrepreneur Magazine's E-Biz Radio Show, SearchEngineRadio and the eMarketing Talkshow.






Comments(5)

This is really great timing. I just got off a conference call with our national web team and this was brought up. Our URL's deep in the site are very ugly and I was wishing to clean them up to be more SEO friendly. Well, now I know and knowing is half the battle (insert catching tag line here). Thanks Jil.

We have just had a kick off meeting with a client who used keyword-rich urls but used underscores instead of hyphens. The site was only a few months old but all the pages had been cached and had PR value so we decided to leave the the urls alone.

There are so many other bigger opportunities for SEO improvement that asking for a url change isn't worth the time or expense.

We did do some tests that might prove helpful which you can see at this blog post about hyphens & dashes versus underscores.

Yeah, for such clear thinking... So much of SEO is theory and not based no fact... I love it when someone debunks this garbage with so wisdom and clarity.

what about keywords in the domain ? will a site with the keyword in the domain have better SERP than a site that doesn't ?

example:
www.keword-secondword.com
Vs
www.someword-secondword.com

?

Jill,

Thanks for answering a HUGE problem I thought I had with my web site about keyword-rich URLS. All our urls are 1232.html so I thought I had to redo the entire site. I will focus on "Title tag, the anchor text pointing to that page, and the words on the actual page itself" like you mention -- and save thousands in the process!

Comments closed after 30 days to combat spam.


Search Engine Guide > Jill Whalen > Changing URLs