|
|
||
|
Engines |
Base |
Directory |
|
|
|
|||
|
Orbidex © 2001 Orbidex.
Pay-Per-Click (GoTo) vs. Free (Google) Search Engines
Today
when I was making the rounds to the usual spots, I came
across a news headline that read, "Excite teams with
GoTo for paid search facility." For those of you who
are not familiar with GoTo,
it is a Pay-Per-Click search engine, and we have outlined
this in the next paragraph.
Pay-Per-Click engines work like this: when you submit
a website to their database you must specify how much
money you are willing to pay for each time a searcher
clicks on the link to your link. The search results
are returned in order of click price amounts instead
of relevancy. For example, a website that sells insurance
could buy a top 5 listing for cars. This is not
search engine optimization. GoTo
is responsible for supplying results to roughly 75%
of the search engines, and now Excite has jumped onto
the bandwagon. Excite is not completely on, as they
are only going to be using two results from GoTo on
their results pages. This leaves me wondering many things. The
first thing I began to wonder is what kind of effect
this will have on the Search Engine Optimization industry.
If all of the search engines begin to use GoTo for results,
where will this leave all of the search engine optimization
professionals? After more thought on this I became more
confident that the strong search engines and directories
like Yahoo, Google, and ODP will keep things the way
that they are. While some of these search engines charge
you to submit your website to their database, after
submitting to these you can be sure that they will send
a great deal of targeted traffic to your site. Search
engines like these that are strong are not going to
jump to GoTo, because they have no need to. Back to
a cardinal rule: If it's not broken, don't fix it! Another
thought crossed my mind. The Internet was, is, and will
be built by webmasters. If people have a great informational
site, or a great service, that will attract the masses,
they should not have to worry about paying loads of
money to the search engines when people click through
to their site. This is almost a way of penalizing a
webmaster or company for having a quality site that
attracts repeat visitors. Search
engines have plenty of real estate on their results
pages to place advertisements and other forms of partnership
advertisements. I am a Google man myself...I use it
for everything. Google offers a way for webmasters to
pay for placement without compromising the results on
a search. If you follow
this link, you will see that the sites that have
paid to be listed are placed to the right of the results,
and have no immediate effect on the results. There may
be an effect on a sites ranking if they opt to pay for
placement on Google, but it is not a large factor in
Google's algorithm. In my mind, this is the right way
for the search engines to make the money that they need
to stay in business, while still giving the user what
they are looking for: relevant search results. Niki
Scevak wrote an interesting article
for internet.com concerning this matter, but Mr.
Scevak has a different point of view. The reason I like
his article is because of the title: Is the Internet
Becoming A Commercial Directory? Sadly, I think that
he is right, and it can be seen more and more everyday. The
Internet is no longer a world wide web that is inter-linked
and a free informational resource for everyone to use.
There have been recent technological developments, by
companies like Microsoft, that would allow someone to
add a link on your site without your permission. It
is all of these things that get this editor concerned
and keep me up at night. If
you are interested in learning more about this new technology,
please come back next week as we will explore what it
is, how it is used and implemented, and what effects
it will have on the Internet
|