AddThis Feed Button
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Richard Ball over at the Apogee Weblog has an interesting post this week that looks into the relationship that Google AdWords has with partner sites. In it, he claims that Google is colluding with spammers by feeding junk traffic from parked domains. He's upset because Google often lumps these domains in with the sites in their search network. That means that the only way to opt out of them is to decide to opt out of the valuable traffic that comes from some of Google's more mainstream search partners.

Here's how Richard lays it out...(snipped for brevity, read the full post at his blog)

Google talks about how good its click fraud prevention algorithms are and how diligent they are about not charging advertisers for clicks. I'm not seeing that. I'm seeing one of Google's "Adsense for Domains" partners cheating my client.

[snip]

I can live with parked domains cropping up on the Content network. You can use the AdWords Site Exclusion Tool to block sites on the Content network. Despite suggestions that this tool now works for parked domains on the Search network, that is not the case. So, it's either turn off the Search network and lose valid traffic with invalid traffic or split a campaign into two and run ads on the Search network at lower bids. Yes, that'll minimize the risk but it still means the loss of valid traffic.

[snip]

I don't know if information.com owned by oversee.net who also happens to own domainsponsor.com are spammers or not. I'd be hesitant to label anyone a spammer without solid proof. I do wonder, though, where they get their traffic from. How can parked domains bring more traffic than a property like google.com? Gee, it just so happens that this is the case for some expensive keywords. Whether these guys or spammers or not, Google is guilty of cheating its clients, the AdWords advertisers. I think they're looking out for these domainers more so than their advertisers.

Now there are several issues at play here (and it really is worth reading his full post instead of the little snippets here) and on some points I agree with Richard and on other points I do not.

I think the absolute most important point to take from his post is the issue of having parked domains included in the search network. Sure, these sites will sometimes have search engines attached to them, but let's not fool ourselves. Few people type in a direct domain that ISN'T google.com or ask.com or what-have-you and plan to conduct a search when they get there. Thus, these types of sites really should be counted as part of the content network, not the search network. He's absolutely right when he says that Google needs to provide advertisers with a way to opt out of having their ads appear on these sites.

See the thing about parked domains is that they CAN provide a legitimate source of targeted traffic. It's also not unusual for a company to own hundreds or thousands (or hundreds of thousands) of domains and to funnel traffic from all of them to a single site. That's how people catch misspellings, typos and even junk URLs and make something of the traffic.

The way I see it, Richard makes a good call in stating that advertisers need to band together to demand that these types of sites be placed in a category that allows advertisers to opt out of them without having to opt out of the entire search network. On the other hand, I just can't back his inference that "domainers" are spammers.

That said, it's a good reminder that you should constantly be checking the referrers that paid search networks send to your sites. Fraud or not, you need to come up with a way to deal with the clicks that don't convert.

Small Business Marketing Unleashed Conference Sponsor



Get Updates

weekly newsletter




RealTechNetwork Ad Sales
Specializing in all forms of rich media.

SEO Friendly Directory
Get a Sponsored Listing for only $29!

SES Chicago, Dec 8-12
Maximize visibility of your site.

DirJournal Web Directory
SE Friendly, Mult. Listing Options



Video Cast

Sage Lewis Video

Video blogger Sage Lewis keeps you up to date with what's hot in the world of search engine marketing.



www.flickr.com

Jennifer Laycock is the Editor of Search Engine Guide, an educational web site aimed at translating the search marketing world into something that small business owners can understand. Jennifer specializes in common sense search engine marketing, viral marketing and customer outreach via social media and blogs. A former search marketing consultant and in-house trainer, Jennifer’s clients have included companies like Verizon, American Greetings and Highlights for Children. Her primary clients now are a little girl named Elnora and a little boy named Emmitt.