Forget SEO, You Need SPO: Search Person Optimization

• Rankings Are Cool and All, But How Do You Turn Them Into Traffic?
• Dear Client: I Love You, But Will You PLEASE Stop Obsessing Over Your Search Engine Rankings?
• 9 Paths of SEO Enlightenment, Part I
• Does an Over-Optimization Penalty Exist?

Good article, although, when I first got into SEO my first thought wasn't "wow, number one for there main keyword, go me", it was "what's the point in optimising a website for a search engine, when the websites not that usable, the structure is poor and thre is no real sence to the navigation". I've been doing website optimisation for people rather than search engines for over a year now, and I have to admit, I have seen much better results in terms of click throughs, sales and product visability.

Great comment, Martin. That's the way its supposed to be done. Those that don't look at how their visitors interact with their site are leaving out a big factor in success.

You've just skimmed across many existing industries and tried to coin a term?

Stoney, I like your thinking, for it brings us back to the main point, which is to make the site findable and useable by humans. And as search engines become more 'human-like' then it makes sense to optimize for humans.

One very important thing I've learned form my previous company is Usability of website. We are always after how the user navigates and use our site so they can find what they are looking for.

Insightful post Stoney. I like it when you call the process "Website Optimization". It's like how I call my services. As a matter of fact, I use two terms instead of SEO:

1) Website Optimization, which means on-page SEO
2) Website Promotion, which means off-page SEO

The ultimate goal of SEO should be attracting, retaining and converting the targeted traffic. I should say that I've always had noticed the confusion people have when talking about SEO when they aren't specialized in the so-called search engine optimization methods. They've heard that SEO works. So, they come to you and ask for it, but many don't know what it really is that they refer to as SEO.

Yes, this is good. The search engines don't purchase the services and products featured on websites; people do. One thing I have to stress over and over again to my clients is that a strong, well written description tag can do wonders for clearly communicating what they offer to their target audience. But they also need to understand that the content on that page must then back up the description. It's all for the people.

Great post; thanks so much!

Well said! I also somehow didn't like the term Search engine optimization....though I don't even like it to be called SPO...

I'd myself call it Search Engine Rankings Specialist (SARS) or SE Rankings expert for SEO but then there are very few people people who really play well with keywords and understand search engines.

You need to optimize your title tag to be compelling enough to make the visitor click your over someone else's. I see that you are trying to say that the person is being presented with companies all offering the same widget--so show that I'm different, but when the competitors who are in places #1, #2, #3 and #4 have title tags that are keyword loaded, I still don't have a lot of faith in the searcher to make it past them simply because of their sheer position.

Am I being naive?

A lot of searchers don't make it past the #1 position even if it's not the best result. Unfortunately there is nothing you can do about that. They are impulse clickers. But that doesn't make them impulse buyers. So #1 may get more clicks but #5 can get more sales.

This got retweeted 130 times? This article is nothing more than a lame-ass rephrasing of something any intelligent SEO has been saying for a long time now.

So, for try SPO we must try SEO first?

Thanks but I'll stick to Rahman's explanation of things as it's very similar to SPO. I always end up optimizing for search engines and thanks to you I'm now reminded that people buy, search engines don't. Cheers.

I see a lot of sites with very good search engine positions but then the traffic that they get isn't really that good. This only shows that we must strike a good balance between ranking on a keyword and engaging other people go to your site. SEO without SPO is useless.

Uhhh, so you're trying to coin a new phrase...

Let's stick with SEO. No matter how you phrase it, the concept is the same. We don't need anymore useless acronyms.

You got me, Steve, I was trying to coin a new phrase. Forget the first line of the article, you saw right through me. ;-)

You have to be able to juggle your customers (people you are trying to sell to) and search engines (google, yahoo, msn, etc), the most important thing to consider is if your product is truly relevant to that particular keyword it still must get people to buy what your selling.

Yes, you right, Stoney. Need to make optimization not only for search engines but and for visitors and all will be good. thanks for attention

Sure, maybe we don't need a new term, but you make a very good point, Stoney. Why do everything to make your client's site appeal to search engines, when the point, from their perspective, is to appeal to their visitors? I always found "SEO" to be a little disingenuous, anyway. Who cares what search engines (a.k.a. Google, let's be honest) want, what do the users want...?

I agree no matter what term we use the target is the same. Improve a websites perfomance for SE and visitors

Thanks martin its really nice stuff but i think searching searchers is dependent on your targeted country in which you get business

Realy good stuff... Most people with an online presence get caught up with links and forget about onsite SEO, more importantly SPO, this artcle reminded me that both are equally important.
Thanks